Feed supplements, animal (except cat, dog), manufacturing · Kentucky

Alltech Springfield

Springfield, KY · ~59 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alltech Springfield runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Feed supplements, animal (except cat, dog), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Alltech Springfield: 5.1 TCR = 131% of Feed supplements, animal (except cat, dog), manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alltech Springfield safety composite

Alltech Springfield scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2021

Alltech Springfield injury rate improved

Alltech Springfield's TCR fell 2.0 from 4.3 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Springfield, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 131% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #14/23
  • PHOTO Livermore Feedmill
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Livermore Feedmill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Alltech Springfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alltech Springfield averages 5.1 TCR (131% of the Feed supplements, animal (except cat, dog), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alltech Springfield TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=2.3 · BLS 3.9

Where Alltech Springfield falls in its industry

756 Feed supplements, animal (exce establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 23 Feed supplements, animal (exce employers in Kentucky.

Alltech Springfield (59 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Alltech Springfield
Alltech Springfield (59 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Alltech Springfield has more employees than the Feed supplements, animal (except cat, do median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 8.1 6.1 4 0 0
2019 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2018 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2017 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2016 4.3 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · KY · Springfield

756 Feed supplements, animal (except cat, dog), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 12 employers in Springfield, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Livermore Feedmill 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockmart Feed Mill 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waldron Feed Mill 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Farms 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Futrell Farms, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Road Builders LLC dba Greenville Quarries 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Century Construction Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3102 - Kentucky Lock Cofferdam 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR INOAC Group North America llc 407 FTE
CITY-NEAR INOAC USA 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haydon Bridge Company 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 54 FTE
NAT-TCR Riceland Foods Incorporated, New Madrid 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Task Force Tips LLC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Care at Home (247-SACHS) 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mary Lanning Memorial Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Todd-Dickey Nursing and Rehabilitation 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marshall Dekalb Electric Coop 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elkhart Rehabilitation Center 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastgate Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.