Consumer electronics merchant wholesalers · Pennsylvania

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse

Philadelphia, PA · ~75 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse runs at 329% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Consumer electronics merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse: 7.2 TCR = 329% of Consumer electronics merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse safety composite

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.4

2017→2021

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse injury rate improved

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse's TCR fell 11.4 from 11.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.4 · 2018=16.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423620 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 329% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Recker & Boerger, Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Recker & Boerger, Inc (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse averages 7.2 TCR (329% of the Consumer electronics merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse TCR series: 2017=11.4 · 2018=16.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse falls in its industry

91 Consumer electronics merchant establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Consumer electronics merchant employers in Pennsylvania.

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse (75 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse
Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse (75 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Almo Corporation, PA Warehouse has more employees than the Consumer electronics merchant wholesaler median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2018 16.8 5.6 3 0 0
2017 11.4 3.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423620 · PA · Philadelphia

91 Consumer electronics merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Recker & Boerger, Inc 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSI Corp 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Experience Center 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waring Products 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - Starr Road Complex 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5D Field Services, LLC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE FMS Construction Company 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE B&D Builders 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Riverview Healthcare Center 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Priority Sign Manufacturing 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunshine Canyon Landfill 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZMON 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gateway Rehabilitation and Healthcare 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes, Holdings 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lyman Morse Boatbuilding 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Foam 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.