Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard · Arkansas

Alpha Packaging

Greenwood, AR · ~108 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alpha Packaging runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Alpha Packaging: 4.5 TCR = 135% of Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alpha Packaging safety composite

Alpha Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

Alpha Packaging injury rate improved

Alpha Packaging's TCR fell 3.5 from 6.4 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Greenwood, AR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 135% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #22/25
  • PHOTO TRG GenCorr LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TRG GenCorr LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Alpha Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alpha Packaging averages 4.5 TCR (135% of the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alpha Packaging TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Alpha Packaging falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 25 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap employers in Arkansas.

Alpha Packaging (108 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Alpha Packaging
Alpha Packaging (108 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Alpha Packaging has more employees than the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and pap median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.2 4 0 0
2023 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.7 3.8 8 0 0
2018 9.8 8.1 11 0 0
2017 4.8 1.9 5 0 0
2016 6.4 3.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · AR · Greenwood

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 9 employers in Greenwood, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TRG GenCorr LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAPP Cambridge - 006 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KINGSBURG, CA 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson Corrugated, LLC 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONWAY OFFICE & FIELD 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE OKF Corporate Offices 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arkansas 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate SignWays 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3231 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3231 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armedica by PHS 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armedica 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Albany Green Energy 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Golden Gateway 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodley's Fine Furniture 320 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sully-Jones Roofing 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Workzone Services 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Concrete Systems, Inc. 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Bend in 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Architectural Solutions, Inc. 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.