Paper and paperboard converting machinery manufacturing · Wisconsin

Alpha Prime Inc.

Menasha, WI · ~21 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alpha Prime Inc. runs at 497% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Paper and paperboard converting machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Alpha Prime Inc.: 16.4 TCR = 497% of Paper and paperboard converting machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alpha Prime Inc. safety composite

Alpha Prime Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−36.9

2017→2023

Alpha Prime Inc. injury rate improved

Alpha Prime Inc.'s TCR fell 36.9 from 36.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 36.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=36.9 · 2018=19.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=31.9 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333243 · Menasha, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 497% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/25
  • PHOTO U.S. Blades Sub LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: U.S. Blades Sub LLC (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Alpha Prime Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alpha Prime Inc. averages 16.4 TCR (497% of the Paper and paperboard converting machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alpha Prime Inc. TCR series: 2017=36.9 · 2018=19.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=31.9 · 2021=11.4 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Alpha Prime Inc. falls in its industry

137 Paper and paperboard convertin establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 25 Paper and paperboard convertin employers in Wisconsin.

Alpha Prime Inc. (21 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Alpha Prime Inc.
Alpha Prime Inc. (21 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Alpha Prime Inc. has fewer employees than the Paper and paperboard converting machiner median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 15.6 15.6 2 0 0
2021 11.4 5.7 2 0 0
2020 31.9 15.9 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 19.1 6.4 3 0 0
2017 36.9 26.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333243 · WI · Menasha

137 Paper and paperboard converting machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 55 employers in Menasha, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR U.S. Blades Sub LLC 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mereen Johnson LLC Webster SD 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intex Technologies 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simonds Internation, Big Rapids 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westby 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inguran LLC (dba STgenetics-Vienna Farms) 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALL ENERGY SOLAR MADISON WI 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faith Technologies 2,712 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSC Communications Menasha Print 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Book Company - Menasha 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transcontinental Packaging Menasha 280 FTE
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Duluth 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tippins 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HG851 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Deblin, Inc. 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn & Suites - Riverton 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE SII West Point 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillsboro Branch 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle - Midfield,AL 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.