Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · Colorado

Alpha Zulu Logistics

Lafayette, CO · ~153 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alpha Zulu Logistics runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade F.

Alpha Zulu Logistics: 17.9 TCR = 276% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alpha Zulu Logistics safety composite

Alpha Zulu Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alpha Zulu Logistics: 16.2 → 22.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 22.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.48× in 2024

Alpha Zulu Logistics's TCR rose 6.7 from 16.2 in 2022 to 22.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Lafayette, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.9 · 276% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #120/140
  • PHOTO Tailwind Delivery LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tailwind Delivery LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Alpha Zulu Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alpha Zulu Logistics averages 17.9 TCR (276% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alpha Zulu Logistics TCR series: 2022=16.2 · 2023=14.7 · 2024=22.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Alpha Zulu Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #120 safest of 140 Local letter and parcel delive employers in Colorado.

Alpha Zulu Logistics (153 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Alpha Zulu Logistics
Alpha Zulu Logistics (153 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Alpha Zulu Logistics has more employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.9 8.6 48 0 0
2023 14.7 8.0 22 0 0
2022 16.2 8.6 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CO · Lafayette

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 60 employers in Lafayette, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tailwind Delivery LLC 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 504 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Larkey Delivery 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 786 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Araco Concrete Contractor LLC 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ken Caryl Glass Inc. 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Applewood Plumbing, Heating and Electric 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCAM R&D 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital 1,484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Medical Center 1,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Imagine! 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR Developmental Disabilities Center dba Imagine! 700 FTE
NAT-TCR Department of State Hospitals - Coalinga 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wadley SNF, LLC 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Commuity Addiction Recovery Enterprise - Anoka 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Duo-Safety Ladder Corporation 17.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charlottesville - Police 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Vista Embassy Suites 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hallmark Manor 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABS Sanford Door 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.