Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory, electrolysis) services · Florida

Altamonte Springs

Altamonte Springs, FL · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Altamonte Springs runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory, electrolysis) services workplace, earning a grade D.

Altamonte Springs: 2.8 TCR = 132% of Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory, electrolysis) services BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Altamonte Springs safety composite

Altamonte Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Altamonte Springs held a steady TCR band

Altamonte Springs's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812199 · Altamonte Springs, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.8 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Girling Community Ca…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Girling Community Care - Lubbock (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Altamonte Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Altamonte Springs averages 2.8 TCR (132% of the Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory, electrolysis) services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Altamonte Springs TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Altamonte Springs falls in its industry

28 Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory employers in Florida.

Altamonte Springs (40 employees, TCR 2.8) among 13 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 14 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Altamonte Springs
Altamonte Springs (40 employees, TCR 2.8) among 13 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Altamonte Springs has fewer employees than the Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory, electrol median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 16.6 16.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812199 · FL · Altamonte Springs

28 Hair removal (i.e., dipilatory, electrolysis) services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 94 employers in Altamonte Springs, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Girling Community Care - Lubbock 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spa at the DelMonte 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanover 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gadabout SalonSpas 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Triple D Farm 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMG Citrus Happy Food 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village farms Heathrow Florida 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Villages Grown Farm 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Altamonte Springs 2,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Altamonte 2,195 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Health System Corporate Headquarters 988 FTE
CITY-NEAR AHS Corporate AIT Solutions Building 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Grocer Supply Company : Coppell, TX (GDC/PDC) 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Berlin High School 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Longwood YMCA 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Keel Street warehouse 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vesuvius USA Wurtland Kentucky 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amita Health Saint Joseph Hospital Chicago 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mayer Malbin 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pm Electric Inc. 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.