Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · New York

Amada Tool America, Inc.

Batavia, NY · ~75 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amada Tool America, Inc. runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Amada Tool America, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amada Tool America, Inc. safety composite

Amada Tool America, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2018→2024

Amada Tool America, Inc. injury rate improved

Amada Tool America, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 4.4 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.4 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Batavia, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Dominion Technologie…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dominion Technologies Group, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Amada Tool America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amada Tool America, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amada Tool America, Inc. TCR series: 2018=4.4 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=4 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Amada Tool America, Inc. falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in New York.

Amada Tool America, Inc. (75 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Amada Tool America, Inc.
Amada Tool America, Inc. (75 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Amada Tool America, Inc. has more employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.0 1.4 3 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2018 4.4 1.5 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · NY · Batavia

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 81 employers in Batavia, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dominion Technologies Group, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jolico / J-B Tool, Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oberg Freeport 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Century Specialties 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE O&R Blue Hill 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Venia Conctracting LLC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE 102843 - Rondout West Branch Bypass Water Tunnel 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE McLaughlin Construction Corp. DBA Edbauer Construction 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Memorial Hospital 827 FTE
CITY-NEAR O-AT-KA Milk Products LLC 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR O-AT-KA Milk Products Cooperative, Inc. 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP Hood-Batavia 415 FTE
NAT-TCR Glastender, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Christus St. Michael Hospital - Transport 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dublin 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Montgomery Farms Builders 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Decatur Manor, LLC 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Florida Constructors, LLC - Tampa 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aftco Manufacturing Co Inc 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.