Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Amador Residential Care Facility

Jackson, CA · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amador Residential Care Facility runs at 616% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Amador Residential Care Facility: 23.4 TCR = 616% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amador Residential Care Facility safety composite

Amador Residential Care Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amador Residential Care Facility: 27.3 → 51.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 51.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.08× in 2024

Amador Residential Care Facility's TCR rose 24.2 from 27.3 in 2022 to 51.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Jackson, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.4 · 616% of ind

  • DART 48.6 DART
  • RANK #608/635
  • PHOTO Simi Hills
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Simi Hills (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Amador Residential Care Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amador Residential Care Facility averages 23.4 TCR (616% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amador Residential Care Facility TCR series: 2022=27.3 · 2023=19.5 · 2024=51.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Amador Residential Care Facility falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #608 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Amador Residential Care Facility (31 employees, TCR 23.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Amador Residential Care Facility
Amador Residential Care Facility (31 employees, TCR 23.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Amador Residential Care Facility has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 51.5 48.6 2 16 0
2023 19.5 16.2 5 1 0
2022 27.3 27.3 4 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Jackson

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Jackson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Simi Hills 23.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SYC-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR SAL COTTAGE 23.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Creek Inn 23.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bridge at Farmington Assisted Living 23.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GCF 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nielsen Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Star Nurseries LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Growers Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort 981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30286) 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amador County 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Amador Hospital (110-7001) 452 FTE
NAT-TCR Syc-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Sal Cottage 23.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet of Madras 23.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spring Creek Inn 23.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gresham Fire & Emergency Services 23.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE H2 Decatur 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market-Melville 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE University Of Pittsburgh 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston WV Vend 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.