Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics · Texas

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas

Dallas, TX · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics workplace, earning a grade C.

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas: 2.8 TCR = 86% of Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas safety composite

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2021→2022

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas injury rate improved

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.3 in 2021 to 1.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.3 · 2022=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 314120 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO HomTex, Inc. - Leoma
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HomTex, Inc. - Leoma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas averages 2.8 TCR (86% of the Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas TCR series: 2021=4.3 · 2022=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas falls in its industry

97 Cushions (except carpet, sprin establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Cushions (except carpet, sprin employers in Texas.

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas
Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas (38 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Amalgamate Processing Inc Luxor Dallas has fewer employees than the Cushions (except carpet, springs) made f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.3 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

314120 · TX · Dallas

97 Cushions (except carpet, springs) made from purchased fabrics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HomTex, Inc. - Leoma 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX-02 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR G M MATTRESS AND FOAM CORPORATION 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascot Enterprises, Middlebury 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Heubel Material Handling/Oklahoma City OK 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mantua Ohio 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-ERI-ERIE-ERI-PDMT 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fayette County Services 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Yes, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG269 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wynn's Catering, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE HZ JDB Inc 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.