Farm product warehousing and storage (except refrigerated) · Texas

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P.

Amarillo, TX · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Farm product warehousing and storage (except refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade A.

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P.: 1.3 TCR = 22% of Farm product warehousing and storage (except refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. safety composite

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. held a steady TCR band

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493130 · Amarillo, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Cofield Grain
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cofield Grain (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. averages 1.3 TCR (22% of the Farm product warehousing and storage (except refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. falls in its industry

77 Farm product warehousing and s establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Farm product warehousing and s employers in Texas.

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. (25 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P.
Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. (25 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Amarillo Cotton Warehouse, L.P. has fewer employees than the Farm product warehousing and storage (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493130 · TX · Amarillo

77 Farm product warehousing and storage (except refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 351 employers in Amarillo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cofield Grain 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITG Brands - Danville Operations 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stone Management 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marcraft Clothes Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Farms of Monahans 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Feeders, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP 501-508 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amarillo Plant 3,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSA Hospital LLC 2,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-12071000-12071 1,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-30 1,492 FTE
NAT-TCR Dawson Terminal 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kevin Downes Tree Service Co., Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 12 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Division 30 - North Island Fuels 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aina Ola LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Levan Associates Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Economy Roofing & Insulating Co., Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Us Millwright services 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.