Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Minnesota

AMAS Incorporated

Brooklyn Park, MN · ~105 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMAS Incorporated runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade C.

AMAS Incorporated: 3.3 TCR = 86% of Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMAS Incorporated safety composite

AMAS Incorporated scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2022→2024

AMAS Incorporated injury rate improved

AMAS Incorporated's TCR fell 1.3 from 4.4 in 2022 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.4 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Brooklyn Park, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 86% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #17/44
  • PHOTO Marian Moss Enterpri…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marian Moss Enterprises (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

AMAS Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMAS Incorporated averages 3.3 TCR (86% of the Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMAS Incorporated TCR series: 2022=4.4 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where AMAS Incorporated falls in its industry

1,320 Self-help organizations for di establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 44 Self-help organizations for di employers in Minnesota.

AMAS Incorporated (105 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AMAS Incorporated
AMAS Incorporated (105 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

AMAS Incorporated has more employees than the Self-help organizations for disabled per median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Brooklyn Park

1,320 Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 226 employers in Brooklyn Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marian Moss Enterprises 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centerlight Healthcare Wallerstein 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leading Home Care - Baton Rouge 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Catalysts Visalia 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Minnesota 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Boldt Company - Cloquet, MN 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterson Sheetmetal 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0591 - Target Northern Campus 5,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMRG 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Services 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Egan Company 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - WOH1 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lucas Drywall LLC 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1160 East Jericho Turnpk 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gas Construction Lansing 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon Retail LLC - MAB2 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot Foods, Inc. Delaware 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sturgis MI 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aliceville Manor Nursing Home 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.