Buckets, elevator or conveyor, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Amazon Robotics BOS12

North Reading, MA · ~722 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amazon Robotics BOS12 runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Buckets, elevator or conveyor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Amazon Robotics BOS12: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Buckets, elevator or conveyor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amazon Robotics BOS12 safety composite

Amazon Robotics BOS12 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Amazon Robotics BOS12 injury rate improved

Amazon Robotics BOS12's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · North Reading, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO MHSE - Bowling Green
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~722 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MHSE - Bowling Green (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Amazon Robotics BOS12 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amazon Robotics BOS12 averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Buckets, elevator or conveyor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amazon Robotics BOS12 TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Amazon Robotics BOS12 falls in its industry

361 Buckets, elevator or conveyor, establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Buckets, elevator or conveyor, employers in Massachusetts.

Amazon Robotics BOS12 (722 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Amazon Robotics BOS12
Amazon Robotics BOS12 (722 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Amazon Robotics BOS12 has more employees than the Buckets, elevator or conveyor, manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 1.4 1.3 11 1 0
2022 1.0 0.9 7 1 0
2021 0.5 0.3 4 0 0
2020 0.5 0.2 4 0 0
2019 0.8 0.7 6 0 0
2018 0.3 0.1 2 0 0
2017 0.3 0.1 2 0 0
2016 1.2 0.6 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · MA · North Reading

361 Buckets, elevator or conveyor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 27 employers in North Reading, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MHSE - Bowling Green 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Office 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Intelligrated - USS (MD85) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FlexLink Systems Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE FMC - Baystate Franklin Medical Center 722 FTE
STATE-SIZE Museum of Fine Arts Boston 722 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Balance Athletics Lawrence Mill 723 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFS-1 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Reading Corporate Office 947 FTE
CITY-NEAR 244591-MIDDLESEX-ESSEX MA P&DC 547 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDDLESEX ESSEX PDC_1441064 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPER STOP & SHOP 2406 219 FTE
NAT-TCR ARLANXEO Performance Elastomer Orange TX 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Model Dry Cleaners, Charleroi Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Masyan Express, Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Allogene Therapeutic, HQ 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bowen Engineering Corporation 722 FTE
NAT-SIZE F D Thomas Inc 722 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittsburgh Associates 722 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollywood Casino Toledo 722 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.