Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Minnesota

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota

Minneapolis, MN · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade D.

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota safety composite

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota: 0.0 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota's TCR rose 7.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 7.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/38
  • PHOTO Xtreme Marine Corpor…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Xtreme Marine Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9 · 2019=0 · 2020=7 · BLS 3.3

Where Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 38 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Minnesota.

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota
Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Ambassador Steel-Minneapolis Minnesota has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · MN · Minneapolis

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Xtreme Marine Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jarco Steel Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cubic Designs, Inc. - Waupaca 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doing Steel Fabrication LLC 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooten 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Alpha Foods, LLP 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNHT-SEL-HIGHWAY 12' 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fergus Falls CSC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR LSNE Commerce Drive 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Loxley 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S03827 - Lima Hauling 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 345 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quincy QRP 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tubar-Eureka Industrial Group 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Conway Factory Store 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainview Service Center 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.