Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Missouri

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri

St Louis, MO · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade C.

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri: 3.8 TCR = 115% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri safety composite

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri: 4.0 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.12× in 2021

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri's TCR rose 4.0 from 4.0 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · St Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 115% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #14/41
  • PHOTO Universal Steel Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Universal Steel Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri averages 3.8 TCR (115% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 41 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Missouri.

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri
Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Ambassador Steel-St Louis Missouri has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.1 8.1 2 0 0
2020 7.1 3.6 2 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 0 1 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · MO · St Louis

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 349 employers in St Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Universal Steel Inc 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jestex LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Koppers Huntington 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Millennium Building Systems, LLC. - Memphis 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE VALLEY VIEW #2 - 10, 14-16, 18-19 -EST 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Blue Springs Service Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeast Showup Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - MO 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 5,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital South 3,776 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4M Building Solutions 2,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services Higher Education 1,607 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire & Life Safety America Orlando 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet 7710 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Therm-Con #744 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulf Coast Insulation #739 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Service Neon Signs Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinton Avenue NSD 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE The DM Burr Group - Holly Schools 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE SouthernCarlson - Houston Eastex 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.