Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Massachusetts

Ambulatory Care Center

Somerville, MA · ~313 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ambulatory Care Center runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Ambulatory Care Center: 2.0 TCR = 54% of Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ambulatory Care Center safety composite

Ambulatory Care Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2021→2024

Ambulatory Care Center injury rate improved

Ambulatory Care Center's TCR fell 4.9 from 5.8 in 2021 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Somerville, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #15/60
  • PHOTO Grove City
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~313 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grove City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Ambulatory Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ambulatory Care Center averages 2.0 TCR (54% of the Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ambulatory Care Center TCR series: 2021=5.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Ambulatory Care Center falls in its industry

2,836 Physicians' (except mental hea establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 60 Physicians' (except mental hea employers in Massachusetts.

Ambulatory Care Center (313 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ambulatory Care Center
Ambulatory Care Center (313 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Ambulatory Care Center has more employees than the Physicians' (except mental health) offic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.2 5 0 0
2023 1.4 0.6 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.8 5.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MA · Somerville

2,836 Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 67 employers in Somerville, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grove City 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 369 East Main St Suite 3 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medina Medical Office Building 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Porter Physician Services, LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Boston 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yankee Candle Distribution 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hulmes 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polar Southbridge St 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass General Brigham Inc 7,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Partners Community Physicians Organization 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cataldo Somerville 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR AllWays Health Partners 486 FTE
NAT-TCR USA Industries LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nanogate North America LLC. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Molded Fiber Glass 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GFS Texas 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stew Leonard's Paramus 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bureau of Disability Determination Services 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pactiv Evergreen Kinston N.C 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nal Technical Center 313 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.