Bottles, plastics, manufacturing · Illinois

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca

Itasca, IL · ~101 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bottles, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca safety composite

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca held a steady TCR band

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326160 · Itasca, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/34
  • PHOTO Emigsville/Farmbrook
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Emigsville/Farmbrook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca falls in its industry

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 34 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi employers in Illinois.

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca (101 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca
Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca (101 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Amcor Rigid Packaging - SC Division Itasca has more employees than the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326160 · IL · Itasca

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 110 employers in Itasca, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Emigsville/Farmbrook 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcor Rigid Plastics Millville 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Axium Jefferson City 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCT Modesto 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Southern - IL Gas Ops 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE DGIL 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brandt Construction Co. 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS - Mossville, IL - 1MOI2 (CATERPILLAR COE) 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diverzify 1,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fellowes, Inc Itasca 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR JH Associate Management LLC 526 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTS Titan Electric 460 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix D20 Finance 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Orion Marine Group 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MZ-Russell, Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Kalamazoo-City Hall 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stephens Manufacturing Co., Inc. - Tompkinsville 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE PACE Supply Corporate Office 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATS Corporate Office 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sgd Enterprises 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.