Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution · Missouri

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City

Jefferson City, MO · ~50 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City: 0.9 TCR = 76% of Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City safety composite

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2019

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City injury rate improved

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.4 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Jefferson City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #13/127
  • PHOTO Mt. Clements Service…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mt. Clements Service center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City averages 0.9 TCR (76% of the Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, C establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 127 Electric Power Transmission, C employers in Missouri.

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City (50 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City
AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City (50 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson City has fewer employees than the Electric Power Transmission, Control, an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MO · Jefferson City

2,958 Electric Power Transmission, Control, and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 140 employers in Jefferson City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mt. Clements Service center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pontiac Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxwell Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR STANTON SVC CTR 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Opal-Foods Anderson Farm 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services - MO 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE New-Mac Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Neosho, MO 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Salvajor Company 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scholastic Inc. - Jefferson City 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scholastic, Inc. 1,291 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Energy USA, inc. Jefferson City 1,152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Region Medical Center 1,073 FTE
NAT-TCR Turner at UOP a Honeywell Company Shreveport LA 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Norcross GA - Adult/Pediatric Specialists 90-34-39-21 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Inphi Corporation - SCL 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynegy Moss Landing LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Regency Manor Healthcare Center 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-ALBIR7 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blacklick-OHIO 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-843-Williams Sonoma 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.