Combination Utility Services · Missouri

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE

St. Louis, MO · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Combination Utility Services workplace, earning a grade F.

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE: 2.9 TCR = 238% of Combination Utility Services BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE safety composite

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2019

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 238% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO EASTSIDE OPERATIONS …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EASTSIDE OPERATIONS CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE averages 2.9 TCR (238% of the Combination Utility Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE falls in its industry

263 Combination Utility Services establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Combination Utility Services employers in Missouri.

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE (28 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE
AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE (28 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

AMEREN TRANSMISSION - Transmission - UE has fewer employees than the Combination Utility Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · MO · St. Louis

263 Combination Utility Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EASTSIDE OPERATIONS CENTER 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abilene Transmission Svc 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Hooksett East Point Drive 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Grove Service Center-UA 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Hills 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOPV-SEL-PRAIRIE VIEW - LAYING HEN' 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE State Line Combined Cycle 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations - South 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-571-Pottery Barn 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Victory Packaging Detroit 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St Luke'S the Woodlands Hospital 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hazelton 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Borger Healthcare Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA312B 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA311A 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Convent, LA Nucor 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.