Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing · Illinois

American Cylinder Corporate

Peotone, IL · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Cylinder Corporate runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

American Cylinder Corporate: 3.3 TCR = 99% of Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Cylinder Corporate safety composite

American Cylinder Corporate scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2016→2021

American Cylinder Corporate injury rate improved

American Cylinder Corporate's TCR fell 7.9 from 7.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333995 · Peotone, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Tolomatic, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tolomatic, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

American Cylinder Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Cylinder Corporate averages 3.3 TCR (99% of the Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Cylinder Corporate TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where American Cylinder Corporate falls in its industry

137 Pneumatic cylinders, fluid pow establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Pneumatic cylinders, fluid pow employers in Illinois.

American Cylinder Corporate (28 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Cylinder Corporate
American Cylinder Corporate (28 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.6

American Cylinder Corporate has fewer employees than the Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2017 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2016 7.9 7.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333995 · IL · Peotone

137 Pneumatic cylinders, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 7 employers in Peotone, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tolomatic, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HYCO Alabama, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jarp Reman 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Hoists 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elite Growers, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charles River Avian Roanoke 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience Princeton IL Research-PRI2 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tracy Export, Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dralle Chevrolet & Buick Inc 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Steel Container Corporation - Peotone 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkots 307 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartman Landscape 35 FTE
NAT-TCR Kohler Company 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Nation Holdings, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR All Battery Sales and Service Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dept. of Health & Social Services (7) 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Famous Dave's - Forest Lake 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Home City Ice Company - Cleveland - 070 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE LIH - Ground Ops 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cape Fear Valley Health System/Robeson County 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.