Manmade fiber thread manufacturing · North Carolina

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56

Gastonia, NC · ~246 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Manmade fiber thread manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Manmade fiber thread manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 safety composite

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56: 0.4 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.4 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313110 · Gastonia, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #24/74
  • PHOTO Plant 39
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~246 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 39 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Manmade fiber thread manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 falls in its industry

195 Manmade fiber thread manufactu establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 74 Manmade fiber thread manufactu employers in North Carolina.

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 (246 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56
American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 (246 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 2.5

American & Efird Gastonia Plant 56 has more employees than the Manmade fiber thread manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.9 3 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 5 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 8 0 0
2021 3.4 2.7 9 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 3 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 6 0 0
2018 3.5 2.1 10 0 0
2017 2.3 1.9 5 1 0
2016 0.4 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313110 · NC · Gastonia

195 Manmade fiber thread manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 182 employers in Gastonia, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant 39 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 23 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Complex 46 Plant 3 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkdale America LLC Plant 7 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairfax 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America : North Wilkesboro 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milton Roy LLC 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Preformed Line Products 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston Memorial Hospital, Incorporated d/b/a CaroMont Regional Medical Center 3,156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston County Government 1,711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wix Allen Plant 931 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gastonia Components and Logistics - Tulip 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Mays Landing 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cajun Sugar Compant LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Georgetown Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlie Irwin Painting, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Texas Exterior Systems 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Office 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgestone Golf 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcor Flexibles Mundelein 246 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.