Environmental remediation services · Washington

American Environmental Construction

Seattle, WA · ~29 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Environmental Construction runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Environmental remediation services workplace, earning a grade D.

American Environmental Construction: 4.1 TCR = 158% of Environmental remediation services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Environmental Construction safety composite

American Environmental Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.6

2019→2023

American Environmental Construction injury rate improved

American Environmental Construction's TCR fell 12.6 from 16.4 in 2019 to 3.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=16.4 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 158% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #14/20
  • PHOTO MEG HVO Branch
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEG HVO Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

American Environmental Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Environmental Construction averages 4.1 TCR (158% of the Environmental remediation services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Environmental Construction TCR series: 2019=16.4 · 2020=0.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=3.8 · BLS 2.6

Where American Environmental Construction falls in its industry

672 Environmental remediation serv establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Environmental remediation serv employers in Washington.

American Environmental Construction (29 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Environmental Construction
American Environmental Construction (29 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

American Environmental Construction has fewer employees than the Environmental remediation services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2022 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.2 0.2 5 0 0
2019 16.4 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · WA · Seattle

672 Environmental remediation services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEG HVO Branch 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raleigh 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Professional Asbestos and Lead Services, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HPC Industrial Services LLC H1228 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Griffin Creek Farm 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE DG ORCHARDS LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frenchman Hills 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Fruit, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Country Club of Fairfield 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Waskom 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Cruisers Company, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD#837 Madelia Public School District 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pierce Refrigeration, inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tec 3 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic Powered Metals 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reesman Service Corporation 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.