Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing · Illinois

American Equipment and Machine, Inc

Centralia, IL · ~68 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Equipment and Machine, Inc runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

American Equipment and Machine, Inc: 8.3 TCR = 253% of Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Equipment and Machine, Inc safety composite

American Equipment and Machine, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

American Equipment and Machine, Inc: 6.7 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.03× in 2017

American Equipment and Machine, Inc's TCR rose 3.3 from 6.7 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333131 · Centralia, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 253% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO MGL ENGINEERING INC.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MGL ENGINEERING INC. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

American Equipment and Machine, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Equipment and Machine, Inc averages 8.3 TCR (253% of the Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Equipment and Machine, Inc TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=10 · BLS 3.3

Where American Equipment and Machine, Inc falls in its industry

105 Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgi establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgi employers in Illinois.

American Equipment and Machine, Inc (68 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Equipment and Machine, Inc
American Equipment and Machine, Inc (68 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3

American Equipment and Machine, Inc has fewer employees than the Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 10.0 8.6 7 0 0
2016 6.7 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333131 · IL · Centralia

105 Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 42 employers in Centralia, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MGL ENGINEERING INC. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Rock Resources 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Iron Works 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ground Force Mfg 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries -MAG 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva STJ1 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2057-Centralia, IL 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Rockford Service Center 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Centralia 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1395 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1395 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swan Surfaces 213 FTE
NAT-TCR GCT - Plainfield 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Production Center 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #102 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SYGMA Denver 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Clinton LLC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Board Mill Operations 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dow Chemical Co - West Alexandria, Ohio 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Health 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.