Artificial turf installation · Nebraska

American Fence Company, LLC

Omaha, NE · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Fence Company, LLC runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Artificial turf installation workplace, earning a grade D.

American Fence Company, LLC: 3.7 TCR = 132% of Artificial turf installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Fence Company, LLC safety composite

American Fence Company, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

American Fence Company, LLC injury rate improved

American Fence Company, LLC's TCR fell 0.7 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 132% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO JARRETT PAVING, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JARRETT PAVING, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

American Fence Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Fence Company, LLC averages 3.7 TCR (132% of the Artificial turf installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Fence Company, LLC TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where American Fence Company, LLC falls in its industry

1,634 Artificial turf installation establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Artificial turf installation employers in Nebraska.

American Fence Company, LLC (44 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate American Fence Company, LLC
American Fence Company, LLC (44 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

American Fence Company, LLC has fewer employees than the Artificial turf installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 3 0 0
2021 4.9 2.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.2 7.5 3 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NE · Omaha

1,634 Artificial turf installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JARRETT PAVING, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR All-Rite Fence Services, LLC. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Fence, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beynon Sports 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pillen Family Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Iowa Missouri 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE DEG Enterprises Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Alpha Insulation Nashville 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Augustine Towers 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JR Setina Manufacturing Yelm Hwy 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ATS - 194 Hempt Road 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Denny's 7741 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE OG&E-Redbud Plant 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harborview Elementary 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDC East Hillside Campus 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.