Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Wisconsin

American Fence Company

Plover, WI · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Fence Company runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade A.

American Fence Company: 1.2 TCR = 42% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Fence Company safety composite

American Fence Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

American Fence Company held a steady TCR band

American Fence Company's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Plover, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/35
  • PHOTO McDonough Constructi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McDonough Construction Rentals Houston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

American Fence Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Fence Company averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Fence Company TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where American Fence Company falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 35 Fence installation (except ele employers in Wisconsin.

American Fence Company (28 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate American Fence Company
American Fence Company (28 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

American Fence Company has fewer employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.7 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · WI · Plover

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 57 employers in Plover, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McDonough Construction Rentals Houston 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merico Abatement Contractors Inc. - Luminant Power Plant- Martin Lake 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR hth Indianapolis 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Cleveland Branch 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spring Grove Dairy - SGD382 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand View Dairy Farm, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cross Farms 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2404-DeForest, WI 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1828 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1828 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monogram Appetizers Moore Road 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monogram Appetizers, LLC - MR 329 FTE
NAT-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Greenville 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR iSX Construction, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Allied Contractors, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ballantine 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Medical Park 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barnes Greenhouses Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAEVA Geophysics of Virginia 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gould's Olive Branch #30 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.