Meats, fresh or chilled (except poultry and small game), frozen, made from purchased carcasses · Ohio

American Foods Group

Cincinnati, OH · ~183 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Foods Group runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Meats, fresh or chilled (except poultry and small game), frozen, made from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade B.

American Foods Group: 2.0 TCR = 59% of Meats, fresh or chilled (except poultry and small game), frozen, made from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Foods Group safety composite

American Foods Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2019

American Foods Group injury rate improved

American Foods Group's TCR fell 2.2 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 59% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #4/25
  • PHOTO Rich Products Gallatin
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rich Products Gallatin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

American Foods Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Foods Group averages 2.0 TCR (59% of the Meats, fresh or chilled (except poultry and small game), frozen, made from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Foods Group TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where American Foods Group falls in its industry

613 Meats, fresh or chilled (exce establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 25 Meats, fresh or chilled (exce employers in Ohio.

American Foods Group (183 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Foods Group
American Foods Group (183 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

American Foods Group has fewer employees than the Meats, fresh or chilled (except poultry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 1.3 0.9 3 0 0
2017 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2016 3.6 2.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · OH · Cincinnati

613 Meats, fresh or chilled (except poultry and small game), frozen, made from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rich Products Gallatin 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daily's Premium Meats 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt Pleasant Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hormel Foods Corporation 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Municipal Energy Services Agency 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE kdc/one Aromair 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE B & B Molded Products Inc. 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Extrudex Aluminum, Inc 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Vallourec Star Muskogee 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Hill United School Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin Engineering - Neponset 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Save-A-Lot Bradenton - 4404 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Slocomb Windows and Doors 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intellicor Communications Eden Road 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Security Fire Protection 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olivet International Inc 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.