Landscape care and maintenance services · Ohio

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc.

Centerville, OH · ~71 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
31.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. runs at 692% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc.: 31.2 TCR = 692% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. safety composite

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 31.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc.: 28.6 → 33.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 33.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.48× in 2017

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.0 from 28.6 in 2016 to 33.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Centerville, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 31.2 · 692% of ind

  • DART 15.0 DART
  • RANK #215/215
  • PHOTO Cedar Landscape Main…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedar Landscape Maintenance (1.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. averages 31.2 TCR (692% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. TCR series: 2016=28.6 · 2017=33.7 · BLS 4.5

Where American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #215 safest of 215 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Ohio.

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 31.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc.
American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 31.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

American Pride Lawn and Landscaping, Inc. has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 33.7 15.0 7 2 0
2016 28.6 22.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · OH · Centerville

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 40 employers in Centerville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedar Landscape Maintenance 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D. Schumacher Landscaping Inc. - Dennisport 29.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Funk Lawn Care 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Georgia Right of Way - SSEMC 28.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maplewood at Cuyahoga Falls 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Good Samaritan Society 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE London Health and Rehab 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE 445090000 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centerville Health and Rehab 466 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Leonard 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR 34370002-343703 ST LEONARD 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR 014-00923 345 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EWR - Ground Ops 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garden City Container 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Hampshire Location #09 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philips Lighting Mountain Top RDC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kincaid Ready Mix 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.