Polyvinyl film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing · Indiana

American Renolit Corporation

Laporte, IN · ~211 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Renolit Corporation runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Polyvinyl film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

American Renolit Corporation: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Polyvinyl film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Renolit Corporation safety composite

American Renolit Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

American Renolit Corporation: 3.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

American Renolit Corporation's TCR rose 0.4 from 3.0 in 2021 to 3.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Laporte, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #10/25
  • PHOTO Evonik Osceola Facil…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~211 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evonik Osceola Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

American Renolit Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Renolit Corporation averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Polyvinyl film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Renolit Corporation TCR series: 2021=3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where American Renolit Corporation falls in its industry

303 Polyvinyl film and unlaminated establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 25 Polyvinyl film and unlaminated employers in Indiana.

American Renolit Corporation (211 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate American Renolit Corporation
American Renolit Corporation (211 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

American Renolit Corporation has more employees than the Polyvinyl film and unlaminated sheet (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.1 8 0 0
2023 2.6 1.7 5 1 0
2022 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2021 3.0 2.0 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · IN · Laporte

303 Polyvinyl film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 49 employers in Laporte, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evonik Osceola Facility 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACME PLASTICS OF NEW JERSEY INC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Celgard Concord Plant 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inpro Corporation - World Headquarters 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fort Wayne One Summit Square 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaPorte Bakery 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clayton Wakarusa 995 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chemical Manufaturing 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaPorte Hospital 927 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Licorice Company - La Porte, IN 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaPorte 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaPorte Physician Network 280 FTE
NAT-TCR Pac Paper, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MCL Industries- Metal Fab Division 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Our Lady of Lourdes Rmc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tactair Fluid Controls 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Automated Packaging Systems - SPO 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0546 New York 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE PAM Specialty Hospital of Dayton 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Cloud Area Family YMCA 211 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.