Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing · Tennessee

American Snuff Company-Memphis

Memphis, TN · ~195 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

American Snuff Company-Memphis runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

American Snuff Company-Memphis: 3.6 TCR = 108% of Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

American Snuff Company-Memphis safety composite

American Snuff Company-Memphis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

American Snuff Company-Memphis held a steady TCR band

American Snuff Company-Memphis's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.6 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312230 · Memphis, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 108% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO American Snuff Compa…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~195 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Snuff Company (Clarksville) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

American Snuff Company-Memphis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows American Snuff Company-Memphis averages 3.6 TCR (108% of the Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

American Snuff Company-Memphis TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=1 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where American Snuff Company-Memphis falls in its industry

53 Tobacco products (e.g., chewin establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Tobacco products (e.g., chewin employers in Tennessee.

American Snuff Company-Memphis (195 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate American Snuff Company-Memphis
American Snuff Company-Memphis (195 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 153 employees and a TCR of 2.1

American Snuff Company-Memphis has more employees than the Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.6 3.6 6 0 0
2020 6.1 5.0 7 4 0
2019 2.9 2.9 5 0 0
2018 4.3 3.8 8 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2016 3.6 2.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312230 · TN · Memphis

53 Tobacco products (e.g., chewing, smoking, snuff) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,330 employers in Memphis, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Snuff Company (Clarksville) 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Leaf North America/Nash 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park 500 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond MC - JMC 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CCL Label Specialty 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE TN-Tennessee, LLC. 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE KPS Global LLC. TN 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 1460 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2903 SPRANKLE DR 12,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 381940311 9,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 5,599 FTE
NAT-TCR CCB Packaging 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Akron Ariel 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Berber Food Manufacturing, dba Mi Rancho 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fidelitone - Chandler 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkview Wabash County Hospital 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clifton Rehabilitative Nursing Center 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE McWane Ductile - New Jersey 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCC Community Markets Columbia City 195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.