Sugar substitutes (i.e., synthetic sweeteners blended with other ingredients) made from purchased synthetic sweeteners · Texas

Ametsa Packaging, LLC

Paris, TX · ~78 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ametsa Packaging, LLC runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sugar substitutes (i.e., synthetic sweeteners blended with other ingredients) made from purchased synthetic sweeteners workplace, earning a grade C.

Ametsa Packaging, LLC: 3.6 TCR = 108% of Sugar substitutes (i.e., synthetic sweeteners blended with other ingredients) made from purchased synthetic sweeteners BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ametsa Packaging, LLC safety composite

Ametsa Packaging, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2023→2024

Ametsa Packaging, LLC injury rate improved

Ametsa Packaging, LLC's TCR fell 1.6 from 4.4 in 2023 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.4 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Paris, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 108% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #46/58
  • PHOTO Mcgean Livonia
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mcgean Livonia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Ametsa Packaging, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ametsa Packaging, LLC averages 3.6 TCR (108% of the Sugar substitutes (i.e., synthetic sweeteners blended with other ingredients) made from purchased synthetic sweeteners BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ametsa Packaging, LLC TCR series: 2023=4.4 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Ametsa Packaging, LLC falls in its industry

485 Sugar substitutes (i.e., synth establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 58 Sugar substitutes (i.e., synth employers in Texas.

Ametsa Packaging, LLC (78 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ametsa Packaging, LLC
Ametsa Packaging, LLC (78 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Ametsa Packaging, LLC has more employees than the Sugar substitutes (i.e., synthetic sweet median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 4.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · TX · Paris

485 Sugar substitutes (i.e., synthetic sweeteners blended with other ingredients) made from purchased synthetic sweeteners employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 62 employers in Paris, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mcgean Livonia 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Specialty Chemicals Sand Springs 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seymour, IN - PN 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MacDermid Enthone, Inc. 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Americot, Inc 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aim Directional Services, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ironclad 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE RWE Renewables Services LLC-Roscoe 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Soup Supply Company - Paris, Texas 815 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paris Regional Medical Center 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Soup Supply Company 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell's Soup Company 724 FTE
NAT-TCR Springfield University Plaza 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Embassy Suites 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Path Light Consulting, LLC. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Elite Manufacturing Technologies, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DuMolin Community Living 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walters Metal Fabrication, inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mapei 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Electronics Inc 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.