Chickens, slaughtering and dressing · South Carolina

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant

Batesburg, SC · ~2,175 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chickens, slaughtering and dressing workplace, earning a grade F.

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant: 8.0 TCR = 242% of Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant safety composite

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2017→2019

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant injury rate improved

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant's TCR fell 5.7 from 11.0 in 2017 to 5.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.0 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Batesburg, SC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 242% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Carthage Plant
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 477 inj
  • SIZE ~2,175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carthage Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant averages 8.0 TCR (242% of the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant TCR series: 2017=11 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant falls in its industry

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dre establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Chickens, slaughtering and dre employers in South Carolina.

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant (2,175 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant
Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant (2,175 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Amick Farms, LLC Processing Plant has more employees than the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.4 4.1 104 10 0
2018 7.6 6.6 154 4 0
2017 11.0 9.7 219 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · SC · Batesburg

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dressing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 8 employers in Batesburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carthage Plant 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Rock Custom Craft Poultry 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., MLS Location 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clarksville Plant 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE St. Francis Downtown 2,172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville County 2,200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michelin North American Headquarters 2,132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richland County Government 2,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amick Farms, LLC SC Processing Plant 1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Rail STS Batesburg, SC 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Propane, Fuels, and Ice, Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR IG Design Group Americas, Inc. - Leesville, SC 84 FTE
NAT-TCR F/V Seattle Enterprise 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Personal Assistance - Alpena 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 0993 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of East Stroudburg 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Racing Management Co (DBA Parx Casino & Racing Inc) 2,175 FTE
NAT-SIZE MaineGeneral Medical Center - Alfond Center for Health 2,176 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA015 2,174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Tyler,TX-USA 2,173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.