Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Amico Premium Provisions

Howell, MI · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amico Premium Provisions runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Amico Premium Provisions: 5.3 TCR = 240% of Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amico Premium Provisions safety composite

Amico Premium Provisions scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amico Premium Provisions: 0.0 → 10.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

Amico Premium Provisions's TCR rose 10.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 10.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424470 · Howell, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 240% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO Double J Meat Packin…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Double J Meat Packing Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Amico Premium Provisions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amico Premium Provisions averages 5.3 TCR (240% of the Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amico Premium Provisions TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=10.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Amico Premium Provisions falls in its industry

162 Meats and meat products (excep establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 Meats and meat products (excep employers in Michigan.

Amico Premium Provisions (30 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Amico Premium Provisions
Amico Premium Provisions (30 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Amico Premium Provisions has fewer employees than the Meats and meat products (except canned, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.5 10.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424470 · MI · Howell

162 Meats and meat products (except canned, packaged frozen) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 94 employers in Howell, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Double J Meat Packing Inc 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fulton Troika LLC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rose Meat Services Inc. DBA Glen Rose Meat Company 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frank Brunckhorst Co., LLC 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kitchen Farms, Inc. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revolution Farms 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE TES Filer City Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Fermi II Nuclear Power Plant Project 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thai Summit America 797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livingston County 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Livingston Hospital 708 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity Health St. Joseph Mercy Livingston 488 FTE
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Cincinnati Gest St 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Atrium Post Acute Care of Shawano at Birch Hill 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1650 ALLEN, TX 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR IAD Dulles Airport 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE LifeShare Blood Center - Lake Charles 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ricky's Steinway 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Masonry 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penske : 5801-01 Toyota Weld/Princeton, IN 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.