Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing · North Dakota

Amity Technology, LLC

Fargo, ND · ~71 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amity Technology, LLC runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Amity Technology, LLC: 5.9 TCR = 178% of Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amity Technology, LLC safety composite

Amity Technology, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amity Technology, LLC: 6.3 → 9.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Amity Technology, LLC's TCR rose 2.9 from 6.3 in 2021 to 9.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Fargo, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 178% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #6/17
  • PHOTO ACAMPO MACHINE WORKS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ACAMPO MACHINE WORKS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Amity Technology, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amity Technology, LLC averages 5.9 TCR (178% of the Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amity Technology, LLC TCR series: 2021=6.3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=9.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Amity Technology, LLC falls in its industry

433 Combines (i.e., harvester-thre establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 17 Combines (i.e., harvester-thre employers in North Dakota.

Amity Technology, LLC (71 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Amity Technology, LLC
Amity Technology, LLC (71 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Amity Technology, LLC has fewer employees than the Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.1 3.0 3 3 0
2023 5.3 0.0 4 0 0
2022 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2021 6.3 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · ND · Fargo

433 Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ACAMPO MACHINE WORKS 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DUO LIFT MFG 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rawhide Portable Corral INC. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wylie & Son, Inc Manufacturing 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mowbray and Son Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3701 FARGO 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acme Tools - Corporate Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3128 FAMILY FARE WEST BISMARCK 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR Flanagan Lumber Company Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Acampo Machine Works 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Valley Metal Tech, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewis Lumber & Milling Inc 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gebhardt USA 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE John W. Egan Co., Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Most Inc 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.