Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · New York

Amphenol Aerospace

Sidney, NY · ~1,046 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amphenol Aerospace runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Amphenol Aerospace: 1.7 TCR = 51% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amphenol Aerospace safety composite

Amphenol Aerospace scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amphenol Aerospace: 1.5 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

Amphenol Aerospace's TCR rose 0.7 from 1.5 in 2019 to 2.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Sidney, NY AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 51% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO PCB Piezotronics /Ma…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 91 inj
  • SIZE ~1,046 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PCB Piezotronics /Main / Headquarters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Amphenol Aerospace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amphenol Aerospace averages 1.7 TCR (51% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amphenol Aerospace TCR series: 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Amphenol Aerospace falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in New York.

Amphenol Aerospace (1,046 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Amphenol Aerospace
Amphenol Aerospace (1,046 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Amphenol Aerospace has more employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 1.4 19 4 0
2023 1.2 0.7 14 3 0
2022 1.8 0.6 15 3 0
2021 1.7 0.9 16 3 0
2020 1.8 0.7 13 6 0
2019 1.5 0.9 14 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · NY · Sidney

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 12 employers in Sidney, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PCB Piezotronics /Main / Headquarters 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hirel Connectors - Downstairs 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEI GENESIS INC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minco Products, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MPM Waterford 1,046 FTE
STATE-SIZE SME NY 1,047 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lifetime Care 1,044 FTE
STATE-SIZE Swissport Ground Handling - JFK - JFK-GHA 1,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACCO Brands - Sidney 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR SIDNEY #215 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Forest Products LLC New York Plant #326 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR UFP Site Built Sidney, NY 45 FTE
NAT-TCR STR0517 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bauer Design Build, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Creekside Center 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Companion at Home, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garyville Refinery 1,046 FTE
NAT-SIZE Confluence Health 1,046 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brakebush Brothers, Inc. 1,046 FTE
NAT-SIZE Upper Valley Medical Center 1,046 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.