Connectors and terminals for electrical devices manufacturing · Texas

Amphenol Fiber Systems International

Allen, TX · ~129 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amphenol Fiber Systems International runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors and terminals for electrical devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Amphenol Fiber Systems International: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Connectors and terminals for electrical devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amphenol Fiber Systems International safety composite

Amphenol Fiber Systems International scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Amphenol Fiber Systems International held a steady TCR band

Amphenol Fiber Systems International's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335931 · Allen, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Power Solutions Group
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Power Solutions Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Amphenol Fiber Systems International in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amphenol Fiber Systems International averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Connectors and terminals for electrical devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amphenol Fiber Systems International TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Amphenol Fiber Systems International falls in its industry

152 Connectors and terminals for e establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Connectors and terminals for e employers in Texas.

Amphenol Fiber Systems International (129 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Amphenol Fiber Systems International
Amphenol Fiber Systems International (129 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Amphenol Fiber Systems International has more employees than the Connectors and terminals for electrical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.2 0.7 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335931 · TX · Allen

152 Connectors and terminals for electrical devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 81 employers in Allen, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Power Solutions Group 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anova - Sheyenne Dakota LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mechanical Products LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lutron Electronics Co. Inc. - Coopersburg 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petro Mechanical and Supply, LLC 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Center of Excellence - Bld: TXHS - 53 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brownstone Construction 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison Dallas Division 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALLEN CALL CENTER - NOC - ADMIN 695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Allen 469 FTE
CITY-NEAR Andrews Distributing- Allen Facility 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Andrews Distributing Company - Allen 440 FTE
NAT-TCR O.C.Tanner Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia, SC HVAC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR San Francisco, CA HVAC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DB - Main Cafe 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE SSA Santa Ana Regional Center FSS 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manco Ag Services 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3 Dimensional Services 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing Plant 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.