Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Arizona

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood

Cottonwood, AZ · ~68 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood safety composite

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood: 3.1 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.23× in 2017

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood's TCR rose 1.8 from 3.1 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Cottonwood, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #21/25
  • PHOTO Magellan Aerospace -…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magellan Aerospace - Haverhill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 25 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Arizona.

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood (68 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood
Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood (68 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Amphenol Griffith Enterprises--Cottonwood has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2016 3.1 1.5 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · AZ · Cottonwood

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 29 employers in Cottonwood, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magellan Aerospace - Haverhill 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mason Electric Company 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Everett WA) 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace - Rockport 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Surprise 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meritage Homes of Tennessee - Nashville Division 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Building Group 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norstan Communications, Inc.(Intel-Chandler,AZ)* 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Cottonwood 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1299 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1299 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0017-0017-02052 FAC-02052-COTTONWOOD-AZ 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Chicago Schaumburg 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portsmouth (Ohpor) 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens-Illinois Glass Portland N21 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lordstown Seating Systems 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Clinton LLC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Board Mill Operations 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dow Chemical Co - West Alexandria, Ohio 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Health 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.