Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Amphenol Intercon Systems

Etters, PA · ~118 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amphenol Intercon Systems runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Amphenol Intercon Systems: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amphenol Intercon Systems safety composite

Amphenol Intercon Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amphenol Intercon Systems: 1.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Amphenol Intercon Systems's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.0 in 2020 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Etters, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO Eldon Facility
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eldon Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Amphenol Intercon Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amphenol Intercon Systems averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amphenol Intercon Systems TCR series: 2020=1 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Amphenol Intercon Systems falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Pennsylvania.

Amphenol Intercon Systems (118 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Amphenol Intercon Systems
Amphenol Intercon Systems (118 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Amphenol Intercon Systems has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2023 4.7 4.7 4 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2020 1.0 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · PA · Etters

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Etters, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eldon Facility 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Aerospace 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritec 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Oil & Gas 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wholesale tree nursery 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE P.W. Campbell Contracting Co 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE E.K. Services, Inc. 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pleasant Gap Office & Dispatch Office 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4404 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4404 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amphenol FCI 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amphenol - Valley Green 206 FTE
NAT-TCR Corru Kraft Buena Park 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1464 Hin68 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinehurst LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CA - Victorville - 18180 Gateway Dr - The American Bottling Company 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sorbara Construction Corp. 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Center on Aging and Health, LLC 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Amberleigh 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardent Mills Hastings 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.