Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · New Hampshire

Amphenol TCS

Nashua, NH · ~224 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amphenol TCS runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Amphenol TCS: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amphenol TCS safety composite

Amphenol TCS scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2020→2024

Amphenol TCS injury rate improved

Amphenol TCS's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.0 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Nashua, NH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Molex Mooresville, I…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Molex Mooresville, IN Plant 9101 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Amphenol TCS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amphenol TCS averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amphenol TCS TCR series: 2020=1 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Amphenol TCS falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in New Hampshire.

Amphenol TCS (224 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Amphenol TCS
Amphenol TCS (224 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Amphenol TCS has more employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · NH · Nashua

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 179 employers in Nashua, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Molex Mooresville, IN Plant 9101 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAMARILLO CA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airborn Winnsboro 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plastics One, Inc 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1227 - Concord 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Epredia 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Market Basket #36 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE 31 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NHQ/MEC 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern New Hampshire Medical Center 1,737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Hospital 1,515 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NCA 1,445 FTE
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet of Lake Isabella 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 10522 Broad Street 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerald Services Inc 76ETO 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Crane Worldwide Logistics - CLT 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE DEN-ITP 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Sygma Network 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Salt Palace Convention Center 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10695 Porter Ranch 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.