Marine radio communications equipment manufacturing · California

Amron International, Inc.

Vista, CA · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amron International, Inc. runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Marine radio communications equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Amron International, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Marine radio communications equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amron International, Inc. safety composite

Amron International, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.9

2017→2024

Amron International, Inc. injury rate improved

Amron International, Inc.'s TCR fell 12.9 from 12.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Vista, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/43
  • PHOTO Melville
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Melville (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Amron International, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amron International, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Marine radio communications equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amron International, Inc. TCR series: 2017=12.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Amron International, Inc. falls in its industry

247 Marine radio communications eq establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 43 Marine radio communications eq employers in California.

Amron International, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Amron International, Inc.
Amron International, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Amron International, Inc. has fewer employees than the Marine radio communications equipment ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 0 1 0
2020 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.9 10.3 2 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · CA · Vista

247 Marine radio communications equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 197 employers in Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Melville 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR David Clark Company Incorporated 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ETM Electromatic 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 315 Digital Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05-CACTUS 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cactus - 05 949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vista HQ 758 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01-CORP 522 FTE
NAT-TCR Deig Bros. Lumber & Construction Co., Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Engineered Floors BS Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Auburn 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gestamp North American R&D Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaRosa Construction Co., Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service Enterprises Inc. Redwood Falls 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE EI050 - Two Harbors Office 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.