Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation · Connecticut

AMS Wallingford CT

Wallingford, CT · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AMS Wallingford CT runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation workplace, earning a grade D.

AMS Wallingford CT: 4.0 TCR = 141% of Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AMS Wallingford CT safety composite

AMS Wallingford CT scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AMS Wallingford CT: 0.0 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2019

AMS Wallingford CT's TCR rose 4.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Wallingford, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 141% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #27/54
  • PHOTO LOVAZZANO HVAC, INC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LOVAZZANO HVAC, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

AMS Wallingford CT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AMS Wallingford CT averages 4.0 TCR (141% of the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AMS Wallingford CT TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=7.6 · 2019=4.3 · BLS 2.8

Where AMS Wallingford CT falls in its industry

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., co establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 54 Refrigeration system (e.g., co employers in Connecticut.

AMS Wallingford CT (47 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AMS Wallingford CT
AMS Wallingford CT (47 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

AMS Wallingford CT has fewer employees than the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2017 7.6 5.7 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CT · Wallingford

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wallingford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LOVAZZANO HVAC, INC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menifee Valley Air Conditioning. Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camblin Mechanical, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Refrigeration Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lindy Farms 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Danielson Elec 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penna Construction (aka: A.J. Penna & Son Construction) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105603 - 155.7MW Gravel Pit CT Solar 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BDL5 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Hopital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL5 956 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS South Region 606 FTE
NAT-TCR DoubleTree Philadelphia Airport 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hancock Health Buildings 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 150 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ken-Mac Metals - Kenosha 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE TES 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Inn Tysons 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Airoldi Brothers North 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.