Home centers, building materials · California

Anawalt Lumber-Highland

Hollywood, CA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anawalt Lumber-Highland runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Home centers, building materials workplace, earning a grade F.

Anawalt Lumber-Highland: 8.1 TCR = 239% of Home centers, building materials BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anawalt Lumber-Highland safety composite

Anawalt Lumber-Highland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2017→2024

Anawalt Lumber-Highland injury rate improved

Anawalt Lumber-Highland's TCR fell 6.7 from 10.6 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 50.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.6 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=17.7 · 2021=50.6 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444110 · Hollywood, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 239% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #464/496
  • PHOTO BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI - 3362 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Anawalt Lumber-Highland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anawalt Lumber-Highland averages 8.1 TCR (239% of the Home centers, building materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anawalt Lumber-Highland TCR series: 2017=10.6 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7 · 2020=17.7 · 2021=50.6 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.4

Where Anawalt Lumber-Highland falls in its industry

6,309 Home centers, building materia establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #464 safest of 496 Home centers, building materia employers in California.

Anawalt Lumber-Highland (33 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anawalt Lumber-Highland
Anawalt Lumber-Highland (33 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Anawalt Lumber-Highland has fewer employees than the Home centers, building materials median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.6 10.6 1 2 0
2021 50.6 50.6 0 16 0
2020 17.7 14.2 2 3 0
2019 7.0 7.0 1 1 0
2018 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2017 10.6 10.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444110 · CA · Hollywood

6,309 Home centers, building materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 23 employers in Hollywood, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BLOOMFIELD HILLS MI - 3362 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2807-2434 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2807-2607 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2807-0113 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - E6 Hollywood 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Loews Hollywood Hotel 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4755-200005 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR First Entertainment Credit Union 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Springtree Rehabilitation and Health Care Center 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Advance Ready Mix Concrete, Inc Plant 2 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Marion Nursing Facility - 005 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Standard 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aequs Aero Machine 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE NRG Will County Generating Station 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin & Sons Excavating, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE NP Gold Rush LLC - dba Wildfire Sunset 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.