Anodizing equipment manufacturing · South Carolina

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC

York, SC · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Anodizing equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC: 8.7 TCR = 263% of Anodizing equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC safety composite

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2018→2024

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC injury rate improved

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC's TCR fell 11.3 from 14.3 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.3 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · York, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 263% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO Jackson Machine Co.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson Machine Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC averages 8.7 TCR (263% of the Anodizing equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC TCR series: 2018=14.3 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=6 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC falls in its industry

448 Anodizing equipment manufactur establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Anodizing equipment manufactur employers in South Carolina.

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC (35 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC
Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC (35 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Anderson Hydra Platforms, LLC has fewer employees than the Anodizing equipment manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.8 0.0 3 0 0
2021 6.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 12.4 6.2 4 0 0
2019 15.4 13.5 8 0 0
2018 14.3 7.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · SC · York

448 Anodizing equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 30 employers in York, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson Machine Co. 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AATI P1 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rubber City Machinery Corp. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moore Industries 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway Service Center and Warehouse 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLORENCE DISTRICT OFFICE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR York County Government 1,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Catawba Nuclear 1,019 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR York Facility 328 FTE
NAT-TCR Pearson Wall Systems, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TNM003 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chulio Hills Health & Rehab, LLC 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Nursery - Monroe 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seattle Field Office 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orizon, MO 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Hatillo 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cork Howard Construction Co. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.