Cutting and transporting timber · California

Anderson Logging Inc

Fort Bragg, CA · ~85 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson Logging Inc runs at 369% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cutting and transporting timber workplace, earning a grade F.

Anderson Logging Inc: 16.6 TCR = 369% of Cutting and transporting timber BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson Logging Inc safety composite

Anderson Logging Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 7% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

5/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2017→2024

Anderson Logging Inc injury rate improved

Anderson Logging Inc's TCR fell 7.6 from 17.6 in 2017 to 10.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 30.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.6 · 2018=30.0 · 2019=20.6 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=11.0 · 2024=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 113310 · Fort Bragg, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.6 · 369% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO Badger Unified Coope…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 94 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Badger Unified Cooperative Services (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Anderson Logging Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson Logging Inc averages 16.6 TCR (369% of the Cutting and transporting timber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson Logging Inc TCR series: 2017=17.6 · 2018=30 · 2019=20.6 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=11 · 2024=10 · BLS 4.5

Where Anderson Logging Inc falls in its industry

177 Cutting and transporting timbe establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Cutting and transporting timbe employers in California.

Anderson Logging Inc (85 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson Logging Inc
Anderson Logging Inc (85 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Anderson Logging Inc has more employees than the Cutting and transporting timber median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 8.6 7 0 0
2023 11.0 5.5 8 0 0
2022 9.1 4.0 9 0 0
2021 22.2 12.7 14 0 0
2020 12.1 12.1 10 0 0
2019 20.6 17.9 13 2 0
2018 30.0 20.0 21 0 1
2017 17.6 11.8 12 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

113310 · CA · Fort Bragg

177 Cutting and transporting timber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 11 employers in Fort Bragg, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Badger Unified Cooperative Services 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gyppo, Inc. 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Janicki Logging & Construction Co., Inc. 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Traverse Assembly DBA Grand Traverse Pallet 17.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gallo Vineyards, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roche Brothers Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Pauma Valley Yard 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunlet Nursery, Inc. 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 297 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parents and Friends, Inc. 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norcal Last Mile 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harvest Market 113 FTE
NAT-TCR Chicago Asmby 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR J. P. Mascaro & Sons 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Waltham Operation LLC 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Valor Plastics 16.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lake Erie Frozen Foods 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crosby-Ironton High School 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE PacTec Sarasota Plant 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ebert Inc 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.