Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Massachusetts

Anderson Power

Sterling, MA · ~92 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson Power runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Anderson Power: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson Power safety composite

Anderson Power scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anderson Power: 0.0 → 9.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Anderson Power's TCR rose 9.4 from 0.0 in 2022 to 9.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Sterling, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO AirBorn- Taunton
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AirBorn- Taunton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Anderson Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson Power averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson Power TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=9.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Anderson Power falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Massachusetts.

Anderson Power (92 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson Power
Anderson Power (92 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Anderson Power has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.4 0.0 9 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · MA · Sterling

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 14 employers in Sterling, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AirBorn- Taunton 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molex Torrington 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Alden Products 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Marine 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE EQUAL EXCHANGE, INC. 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAPP Westminster 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE AR Metallizing, LTD 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dodge Billerica 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Village, LLC 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR STMABerryGlobal 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Laddawn, Inc. Sterling, MA 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIOMEDICAL POLYMERS INC 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Construction 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PBBS Equipment Corporation - Corporate 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Christopherson Plumbing 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ottawa Dental Laboratory, LLC - Starfire Location 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Tech Services Inc 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Line Building Products LLC Extrusion Operations 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applewood Lumber Co 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Optimal Delivery @ Altitude LLC 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.