Flexographic printing presses manufacturing · New Jersey

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East

Fairfield, NJ · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Flexographic printing presses manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East: 1.2 TCR = 38% of Flexographic printing presses manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East safety composite

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East held a steady TCR band

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333244 · Fairfield, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Ink Jet Printing Sol…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ink Jet Printing Solutions - Dayton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East averages 1.2 TCR (38% of the Flexographic printing presses manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East falls in its industry

82 Flexographic printing presses establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Flexographic printing presses employers in New Jersey.

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East (29 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East
Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East (29 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. East has fewer employees than the Flexographic printing presses manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333244 · NJ · Fairfield

82 Flexographic printing presses manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 88 employers in Fairfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ink Jet Printing Solutions - Dayton 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home/Field 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salt Lake Production 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engage Technologies Corporation 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRP Services Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Construction Group Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renda Roads, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMAC Communications Inc 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand AV Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1175 - Fairfield 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weiss-Aug Surgical Products 241 FTE
NAT-TCR Cogent Waste Solutions LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jet Processing 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafont Inn LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Woolpert- Indianapolis 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE East Harding Construction 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Potetz Home Center Liberty 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE B & B Machine and Grinding Service Corp 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bazin Brothers Trucking, Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.