Flexographic printing presses manufacturing · Ohio

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio

Bryan, OH · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Flexographic printing presses manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Flexographic printing presses manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio safety composite

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio injury rate improved

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio's TCR fell 1.8 from 4.7 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333244 · Bryan, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Maxson Automatic Mac…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maxson Automatic Machinery Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Flexographic printing presses manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2018=7 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=4 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio falls in its industry

82 Flexographic printing presses establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Flexographic printing presses employers in Ohio.

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio (60 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio
Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio (60 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Anderson & Vreeland Inc. Ohio has fewer employees than the Flexographic printing presses manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.0 3.5 4 0 0
2016 4.7 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333244 · OH · Bryan

82 Flexographic printing presses manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 56 employers in Bryan, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maxson Automatic Machinery Company 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valassis Direct Mail Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hertzberg New Method, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milton Production 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE White House Fruit Farm Inc 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wholesale 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Cleveland Habitat for Humanity West 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gutknecht Construction Company 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spangler Candy Co. 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spangler Candy Co. (INC.) 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2191 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allied Moulded Products, Inc. 315 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0014 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 58LX 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR American Sleeve Bearing 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Langboard MDF 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bergen Linen 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE GTPD 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coleman-Adams Construction, Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duce Construction Company 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.