Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing · Alabama

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient

Montgomery, AL · ~51 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient: 5.4 TCR = 165% of Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient safety composite

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient: 2.0 → 21.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 21.8 TCR · DART/TCR 4.01× in 2021

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient's TCR rose 19.8 from 2.0 in 2016 to 21.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 4.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Montgomery, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 165% of ind

  • DART 21.8 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO PX1
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PX1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient averages 5.4 TCR (165% of the Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=21.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient falls in its industry

485 Tint and dye preparations, hou establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Tint and dye preparations, hou employers in Alabama.

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient (51 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient
Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient (51 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Andersons Montgomery Plant Nutrient has fewer employees than the Tint and dye preparations, household-typ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 21.8 21.8 2 9 0
2020 7.1 7.1 3 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · AL · Montgomery

485 Tint and dye preparations, household-type (except hair), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 420 employers in Montgomery, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PX1 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brain Power Inc 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Giles Chemical GDL 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Pac, Inc 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE M&M Calvert 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fossil Generation Gadsden Steam Plant 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE 409 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE AFS Mobile 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 3,611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Medical Center South 2,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Hospital & Clinic 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Genex Cooperative - Farm Systems Melrose 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Linen King, LLC (Springdale) 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Garland Office 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mankato Terminal - NON DOT 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Modern Disposal Buffalo Recycle 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forum Energy Technologies - Sulphur 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forum Energy Technologies - Plantersville 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-995-West Elm 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.