Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · New York

Andrew P. Thomas House

Nanuet, NY · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Andrew P. Thomas House runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade B.

Andrew P. Thomas House: 2.6 TCR = 68% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Andrew P. Thomas House safety composite

Andrew P. Thomas House scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Andrew P. Thomas House: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2019

Andrew P. Thomas House's TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.1 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Nanuet, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #53/336
  • PHOTO Twelfth House
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Twelfth House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Andrew P. Thomas House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Andrew P. Thomas House averages 2.6 TCR (68% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Andrew P. Thomas House TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Andrew P. Thomas House falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 336 Intellectual and developmental employers in New York.

Andrew P. Thomas House (26 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Andrew P. Thomas House
Andrew P. Thomas House (26 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Andrew P. Thomas House has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NY · Nanuet

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 39 employers in Nanuet, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Twelfth House 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homeward Bound Corporate 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leeda Northeast, Inc Ashtabula 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richard Home 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Volles Dairy Farm, LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Mushroom Blvd 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Fillmore 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookfield Renewable - Fulton 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halmar International 766 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Jersey Pool Management, LLC - NNJ 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0305 - NANUET NY WHSE 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPRING VALLEY (NYSPV) 248 FTE
NAT-TCR South Point Office and Service Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Colonial Terminals - Plant 1 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OmniSource LLC - SID Trucking 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Beloit Regional Hospice 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paper & Ink of PA LLC dba Applegate Mfg 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE REN008 Williamsport 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE REN164 Santa Maria 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fas Dsm 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.