Tobacco farming, field and seed production · North Carolina

Andrew Tyson Farms

Nashville, NC · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Andrew Tyson Farms runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tobacco farming, field and seed production workplace, earning a grade B.

Andrew Tyson Farms: 2.6 TCR = 58% of Tobacco farming, field and seed production BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Andrew Tyson Farms safety composite

Andrew Tyson Farms scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Andrew Tyson Farms: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.52× in 2024

Andrew Tyson Farms's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111910 · Nashville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 58% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #12/15
  • PHOTO Steve Mitchell
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Steve Mitchell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Andrew Tyson Farms in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Andrew Tyson Farms averages 2.6 TCR (58% of the Tobacco farming, field and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Andrew Tyson Farms TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=4 · BLS 4.5

Where Andrew Tyson Farms falls in its industry

22 Tobacco farming, field and see establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 15 Tobacco farming, field and see employers in North Carolina.

Andrew Tyson Farms (25 employees, TCR 2.6) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 25 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Strickland Farms PayrollRock Ridge Farms PartnershipYarbrough Farms LLCFarmB & S Farming, Inc.Thomas Family Farms, Inc.FARMHolland Farms, IncAndrew Tyson Farms
Andrew Tyson Farms (25 employees, TCR 2.6) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 25 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Andrew Tyson Farms has more employees than the Tobacco farming, field and seed producti median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 13.2 13.2 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111910 · NC · Nashville

22 Tobacco farming, field and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 30 employers in Nashville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Steve Mitchell 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stuard Tobacco LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vickers Farms 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryant Brothers 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Huntersville 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE River City Achievement Center-Pasquotank 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0410 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 1089 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Leaf North America/Nash 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cavalier Homes of NC 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4459 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4459 207 FTE
NAT-TCR S05400 - Jacksonville Hauling 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JCC Middle School 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hornady Mfg Co 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR St. James Elementary 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Getz Industrial Cleaning 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte Harbor Store # 213 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater- #205 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.