Cutting new rights of way · New Hampshire

Andrews Construction Co., Inc.

Campton, NH · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cutting new rights of way workplace, earning a grade B.

Andrews Construction Co., Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 72% of Cutting new rights of way BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. safety composite

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Andrews Construction Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Campton, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO Scherzinger Drilling…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scherzinger Drilling, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Andrews Construction Co., Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (72% of the Cutting new rights of way BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Andrews Construction Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Cutting new rights of way establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 Cutting new rights of way employers in New Hampshire.

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. (37 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Andrews Construction Co., Inc.
Andrews Construction Co., Inc. (37 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Andrews Construction Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Cutting new rights of way median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.7 2.9 2 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · NH · Campton

1,750 Cutting new rights of way employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 6 employers in Campton, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scherzinger Drilling, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Celtic Demolition Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neill Grading and Construction Company, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.W. Oakes & Son, Inc 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rose Steel, Inc. 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carclo Technical Plastics- Derry 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vitex Extrusion 109 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multi-Med, Inc. 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR MPA Campton 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enhanced Residential Treatment 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vermont Permanency Initiative - Depot St Program 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sub Acute 40 FTE
NAT-TCR Aurora 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kennesaw Store #1702 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Montfort Bros Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant D5 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nicholas Galvanizing 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial Mall Store #2306 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookshire Store #2305 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakwood Contractors Inc 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.