Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Maryland

Andrews Federal Bus Facility

Suitland, MD · ~317 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Andrews Federal Bus Facility runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade D.

Andrews Federal Bus Facility: 9.0 TCR = 200% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Andrews Federal Bus Facility safety composite

Andrews Federal Bus Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Andrews Federal Bus Facility held a steady TCR band

Andrews Federal Bus Facility's TCR held near 0.2 from 8.9 in 2019 to 9.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.9 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Suitland, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.0 · 200% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #15/20
  • PHOTO 1953-1151
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~317 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1953-1151 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Andrews Federal Bus Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Andrews Federal Bus Facility averages 9.0 TCR (200% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Andrews Federal Bus Facility TCR series: 2019=8.9 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=9.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Andrews Federal Bus Facility falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 20 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Maryland.

Andrews Federal Bus Facility (317 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Andrews Federal Bus Facility
Andrews Federal Bus Facility (317 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Andrews Federal Bus Facility has more employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.1 8.8 19 14 0
2021 10.7 10.4 26 12 0
2020 7.2 6.8 17 3 0
2019 8.9 7.8 11 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MD · Suitland

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 12 employers in Suitland, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1953-1151 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-2221 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1181 FOREST GLEN SCHEDULED TRANSIT OPERATIONS 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-2102 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 11800 Tech Rd 317 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4795-PD-SBY-SALISBURY-SBY-PDMT 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDHAG - HAGERSTOWN 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDWAL - WALDORF 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Branch Avenue Rail Yard 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5700 BRANCH AVENUE RAIL FACILITY 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington Vending 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR 238884-TMP-SUITLAND BR 41 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0027-0026-00469 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-02517 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02100 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0024-0024-03600 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mininger Farms 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select Express & Logistics 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norcold Sidney 317 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730207-IF 317 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.